๐Ÿ“– Contents Chapter 7 ยท Rational Expressions
College Algebra · Chapter 7

Rational Expressions

A rational expression is nothing more exotic than a fraction whose top and bottom happen to contain variables. If you can add ½ + ⅓, you already own the machinery for everything in this chapter — the only new work is factoring first so you can see what the pieces really are. There is one genuinely new idea, and it is important: because a denominator can never equal zero, every rational expression comes with a short list of forbidden values of the variable, and you have to name them out loud. That single habit prevents almost every mistake students make here, including the notorious "answer" at the end of a rational equation that turns out not to be an answer at all. Take this chapter slowly, factor everything, and it will feel less like new algebra and more like arithmetic you already trust.

By the end of this chapter you can

  • Define a rational expression and find its excluded values by setting each denominator equal to zero.
  • Simplify a rational expression by factoring completely and dividing out common factors.
  • Explain why you may cancel factors but never terms, and catch that error in your own work.
  • Multiply and divide rational expressions, including flipping the divisor and tracking every restriction.
  • Build a least common denominator (LCD) from factored denominators and use it to add and subtract.
  • Simplify a complex fraction by two different methods and choose the faster one for a given problem.
  • Solve rational equations by clearing denominators with the LCD.
  • Test every candidate solution and discard any extraneous solution.

Section 1Simplifying rational expressions

Graph of a function with a hole at one point, showing a removable discontinuity
Reference. A graph with a hole — the curve behaves normally everywhere except at one excluded value, where the expression is simply undefined. Source and licence: see the figure credits

What a rational expression is

A rational expression is a quotient of two polynomials — one polynomial over another, written P/Q. The word "rational" here has nothing to do with being sensible; it comes from ratio. These are all rational expressions:

(3)/(x)    (x + 5)/(x − 2)    (x2 − 9)/(x2 + x − 12)    (2x + 1)/(7)

That last one has a constant denominator, which is legal — a polynomial of degree zero is still a polynomial. What is never legal is a denominator that equals zero. Division by zero is not "infinity" and it is not "zero"; it is simply undefined, an operation that produces no number at all. Everything careful we do in this chapter flows from respecting that one rule.

Excluded values come first, not last

An excluded value (also called a restriction) is any number that makes a denominator equal zero. Those numbers are thrown out of the domain of the expression. Find them before you simplify anything, because simplifying can hide them — a factor you cancel is gone from the page but its restriction still applies.

To find them, set each denominator equal to zero, factor, and solve. For (x2 − 9)/(x2 + x − 12), the denominator factors as (x + 4)(x − 3), so the product is zero when x + 4 = 0 or x − 3 = 0 — that is, when x = −4 or x = 3. The restrictions are x ≠ −4 and x ≠ 3.

Simplify by factoring, then dividing out factors

The engine of simplification is the fundamental principle of fractions: (a · c)/(b · c) = (a)/(b), as long as b ≠ 0 and c ≠ 0. In words: a factor that appears on both the top and the bottom divides out to 1. Notice the word factor — something being multiplied. That word is doing all the work, and Section 1's pearl explains why.

Worked example 1. Simplify (x2 − 9)/(x2 + x − 12) and state the restrictions.

  1. Factor the denominator and list restrictions. x2 + x − 12 = (x + 4)(x − 3), because 4 · (−3) = −12 and 4 + (−3) = 1. Set each factor to zero: x = −4 and x = 3. So x ≠ −4 and x ≠ 3.
  2. Factor the numerator. x2 − 9 is a difference of squares: x2 − 32 = (x + 3)(x − 3).
  3. Rewrite the whole expression in factored form. [(x + 3)(x − 3)] / [(x + 4)(x − 3)]
  4. Divide out the common factor. The factor (x − 3) appears on top and on bottom, and it divides out to 1: [(x + 3) · 1] / [(x + 4) · 1]
  5. Write the answer with its restrictions. (x + 3)/(x + 4), where x ≠ −4 and x ≠ 3.

Check it numerically. Pick any allowed number — say x = 0. Original: (02 − 9)/(02 + 0 − 12) = (−9)/(−12) = 3/4. Simplified: (0 + 3)/(0 + 4) = 3/4. They match, so the simplification is right. This 30-second check catches nearly every algebra slip, and you should do it every time until it feels unnecessary.

Why keep the restriction x ≠ 3 when the simplified form (x + 3)/(x + 4) is perfectly happy at x = 3? Because the two expressions are only equal where both are defined. The original is undefined at x = 3, so the graph of the original has a hole there — exactly the situation in this section's figure.

Worked example 2. Simplify (3 − x)/(x2 − 9).

  1. Factor and restrict. x2 − 9 = (x − 3)(x + 3), so x ≠ 3 and x ≠ −3.
  2. Notice the opposites. The numerator 3 − x is the opposite of x − 3. Factor out −1: 3 − x = −1(x − 3). Verify by distributing: −1 · x = −x and −1 · (−3) = +3, giving −x + 3 = 3 − x. Correct.
  3. Rewrite. [−1(x − 3)] / [(x − 3)(x + 3)]
  4. Divide out (x − 3). −1/(x + 3), with x ≠ 3 and x ≠ −3.

Check. At x = 0: original = (3 − 0)/(0 − 9) = 3/(−9) = −1/3. Simplified = −1/(0 + 3) = −1/3. Match.

PatternShapeFactored formExample
Common factorevery term shares somethingab + ac = a(b + c)6x2 + 9x = 3x(2x + 3)
Difference of squaresa2 − b2(a + b)(a − b)x2 − 25 = (x + 5)(x − 5)
Trinomial, lead 1x2 + bx + c(x + m)(x + n), mn = c, m + n = bx2 + 7x + 12 = (x + 3)(x + 4)
Trinomial, lead ≠ 1ax2 + bx + csplit the middle term, then group2x2 + 7x + 3 = (2x + 1)(x + 3)
Perfect squarea2 ± 2ab + b2(a ± b)2x2 + 6x + 9 = (x + 3)2
Difference of cubesa3 − b3(a − b)(a2 + ab + b2)x3 − 8 = (x − 2)(x2 + 2x + 4)
Oppositesb − a vs. a − bb − a = −1(a − b)3 − x = −1(x − 3)
Cancel factors, never terms. A factor is multiplied; a term is added. In (x + 4)/4 the 4 on top is a term, so it cannot be cancelled with the 4 on the bottom. Test it with x = 2: the true value is (2 + 4)/4 = 6/4 = 3/2, but "cancelling" would give 2. Not the same number, so the move was illegal. If you cannot see a set of parentheses wrapped around what you want to cancel, you may not cancel it.
Interactive A worked-step machine for simplifying rational expressions: factor, cancel, and watch each excluded value get flagged on a live graph as an invisible hole or a vertical asymptote. Open full ↑
Key points
  • A rational expression is one polynomial divided by another; the denominator may never be zero.
  • Find excluded values first, from the original denominators, and carry them into your final answer.
  • Simplify by factoring completely, then dividing out common factors.
  • Opposites differ by a factor of −1: b − a = −1(a − b).

Section 2Multiplying and dividing

Worked example showing the quotient of two powers with the same base simplified by dividing out common factors
Reference. Dividing out matching factors in a quotient — the same cancelling logic that drives every rational-expression product. Source and licence: see the figure credits

Multiplication: the rule you already know

Multiplying fractions is the friendliest operation there is: multiply straight across. (a)/(b) · (c)/(d) = (ac)/(bd). With numbers you probably already cancel before multiplying — for 4/9 · 3/8 you would cancel the 4 with the 8 and the 3 with the 9 to get 1/3 · 1/2 = 1/6, rather than multiplying to 12/72 and then reducing. Rational expressions demand that same discipline, only more so: if you multiply out (x + 2)(x + 3)(x − 1)(x − 2) first, you will be staring at a fourth-degree polynomial you then have to re-factor. Factor first. Cancel second. Multiply last.

Worked example 3. Multiply (x2 + 5x + 6)/(x2 − 4) · (x2 − 3x + 2)/(x2 + 4x + 3).

  1. Factor all four polynomials.
    x2 + 5x + 6 = (x + 2)(x + 3)   [2 · 3 = 6, 2 + 3 = 5]
    x2 − 4 = (x − 2)(x + 2)   [difference of squares]
    x2 − 3x + 2 = (x − 1)(x − 2)   [(−1)(−2) = 2, −1 + (−2) = −3]
    x2 + 4x + 3 = (x + 1)(x + 3)   [1 · 3 = 3, 1 + 3 = 4]
  2. List restrictions from both denominators. (x − 2)(x + 2) = 0 gives x = 2 and x = −2; (x + 1)(x + 3) = 0 gives x = −1 and x = −3. So x ≠ 2, −2, −1, −3.
  3. Write it as one big fraction.
    [(x + 2)(x + 3)(x − 1)(x − 2)] / [(x − 2)(x + 2)(x + 1)(x + 3)]
  4. Divide out matching factors. (x + 2) cancels with (x + 2); (x + 3) cancels with (x + 3); (x − 2) cancels with (x − 2). What survives on top is (x − 1); what survives on the bottom is (x + 1).
  5. Answer. (x − 1)/(x + 1), with x ≠ 2, −2, −1, −3.

Check at x = 0. First fraction: (0 + 0 + 6)/(0 − 4) = 6/(−4) = −3/2. Second fraction: (0 − 0 + 2)/(0 + 0 + 3) = 2/3. Product: (−3/2)(2/3) = −6/6 = −1. Simplified form: (0 − 1)/(0 + 1) = −1/1 = −1. Match.

Division: multiply by the reciprocal

To divide, flip the second fraction and multiply: (a)/(b) ÷ (c)/(d) = (a)/(b) · (d)/(c). The flipped fraction (d)/(c) is the reciprocal of (c)/(d). Flip only the divisor — the fraction after the division sign — and flip it before you cancel anything.

Division brings one extra restriction that trips people up. You cannot divide by zero, so the divisor itself must not be zero, which means its numerator also generates a restriction. In (a)/(b) ÷ (c)/(d) you must have b ≠ 0, d ≠ 0, and c ≠ 0.

Worked example 4. Divide (x2 − 16)/(x2 + 6x + 9) ÷ (x − 4)/(x + 3).

  1. Factor everything. x2 − 16 = (x − 4)(x + 4); x2 + 6x + 9 = (x + 3)2; the other two are already factored.
  2. Restrictions. (x + 3)2 = 0 gives x = −3. The divisor's denominator x + 3 gives x = −3 again. The divisor's numerator x − 4 = 0 gives x = 4, which we must also exclude because dividing by zero is not allowed. So x ≠ −3 and x ≠ 4.
  3. Flip the divisor and change to multiplication.
    [(x − 4)(x + 4)] / [(x + 3)2]  ·  (x + 3)/(x − 4)
  4. Write as one fraction. [(x − 4)(x + 4)(x + 3)] / [(x + 3)(x + 3)(x − 4)]
  5. Cancel. (x − 4) cancels; one (x + 3) on top cancels one (x + 3) on the bottom, leaving a single (x + 3) below.
  6. Answer. (x + 4)/(x + 3), with x ≠ −3 and x ≠ 4.

Check at x = 0. Dividend: (0 − 16)/(0 + 0 + 9) = −16/9. Divisor: (0 − 4)/(0 + 3) = −4/3. Now divide: (−16/9) ÷ (−4/3) = (−16/9) · (−3/4) = 48/36 = 4/3. Simplified form: (0 + 4)/(0 + 3) = 4/3. Match.

StepMultiplyingDividing
1Factor every numerator and denominator completelyFactor every numerator and denominator completely
2List restrictions from both denominatorsList restrictions from both denominators and from the divisor's numerator
3—Flip the divisor and change ÷ to ·
4Divide out factors common to top and bottomDivide out factors common to top and bottom
5Multiply what's left; leave it factoredMultiply what's left; leave it factored
6State restrictions with the answerState restrictions with the answer
Do not expand what you are about to cancel. The single biggest time sink in this section is multiplying numerators out into long polynomials before cancelling. Factored form is the useful form. If your paper is filling with x3 and x4 terms during a multiplication problem, stop, back up, and cancel first.
Interactive Step through five multiply-and-divide problems on a live factor board where every factor visibly pairs off with its twin and becomes 1 โ€” then test the simplified answer against the original at any value of x and watch the holes appear. Open full ↑
Key points
  • Multiply straight across, but factor and cancel first.
  • Divide by multiplying by the reciprocal of the divisor — flip only the second fraction.
  • In division, the divisor's numerator also creates an excluded value.
  • Leave the answer in factored form unless you are told otherwise.

Section 3Adding and subtracting

A rational expression written as a sum of simpler fractions over common factors
Reference. One rational expression rewritten as a sum of fractions over factored denominators — the same bookkeeping, run in reverse. Source and licence: see the figure credits

Same denominator: the easy case

When the denominators already match, add or subtract the numerators and keep the denominator: (a)/(d) + (b)/(d) = (a + b)/(d). Then simplify the result if it factors. There is one hazard even here, and it involves subtraction — see this section's pearl before you go further.

Building the least common denominator

When denominators differ, you need a least common denominator (LCD): the smallest expression that every denominator divides into evenly. Building one is mechanical:

  1. Factor every denominator completely.
  2. Make a list of every distinct factor that appears anywhere.
  3. Raise each factor to the highest power it reaches in any single denominator.
  4. Multiply those together. That product is the LCD.

This is the same procedure you use with plain numbers. For 6 and 8: 6 = 2 · 3 and 8 = 23. The distinct factors are 2 and 3; the highest powers are 23 and 31; so the LCD is 8 · 3 = 24. Nothing changes when the factors are binomials instead of primes.

DenominatorsFactoredDistinct factors, highest powerLCD
6 and 82 · 3 and 2323, 324
4x and 6x222x and 2 · 3x222, 3, x212x2
x and x + 2x and (x + 2)x, (x + 2)x(x + 2)
x2 − 9 and x + 3(x − 3)(x + 3) and (x + 3)(x − 3), (x + 3)(x − 3)(x + 3)
x2 + 6x + 9 and x2 − 9(x + 3)2 and (x − 3)(x + 3)(x + 3)2, (x − 3)(x + 3)2(x − 3)

Notice row 4: because (x + 3) is already inside x2 − 9, the LCD is not (x2 − 9)(x + 3). Taking each factor only to its highest power is what makes the common denominator least, and it saves you a round of cancelling at the end.

Rewriting and combining

Once you have the LCD, rewrite each fraction with that denominator by multiplying its top and bottom by whatever factor is missing. Multiplying top and bottom by the same nonzero thing does not change the value — it is multiplying by 1 in disguise.

Worked example 5. Add (2)/(x − 3) + (5)/(x + 2).

  1. Restrictions. x − 3 = 0 gives x = 3; x + 2 = 0 gives x = −2. So x ≠ 3 and x ≠ −2.
  2. LCD. The factors (x − 3) and (x + 2) are different and each appears once, so the LCD is (x − 3)(x + 2).
  3. Rewrite each fraction. The first is missing (x + 2); the second is missing (x − 3).
    (2)/(x − 3) · (x + 2)/(x + 2) = [2(x + 2)] / [(x − 3)(x + 2)]
    (5)/(x + 2) · (x − 3)/(x − 3) = [5(x − 3)] / [(x − 3)(x + 2)]
  4. Add the numerators. 2(x + 2) + 5(x − 3) = 2x + 4 + 5x − 15 = 7x − 11.
  5. Answer. (7x − 11) / [(x − 3)(x + 2)], with x ≠ 3 and x ≠ −2. The numerator does not share a factor with the denominator (7x − 11 = 0 only at x = 11/7), so nothing cancels.

Check at x = 0. Original: 2/(0 − 3) + 5/(0 + 2) = −2/3 + 5/2. Common denominator 6: −4/6 + 15/6 = 11/6. Answer form: [7(0) − 11] / [(0 − 3)(0 + 2)] = (−11)/(−6) = 11/6. Match.

Worked example 6. Subtract (x)/(x2 − 9) − (2)/(x + 3).

  1. Factor and restrict. x2 − 9 = (x − 3)(x + 3), so x ≠ 3 and x ≠ −3.
  2. LCD. Distinct factors are (x − 3) and (x + 3), each to the first power: LCD = (x − 3)(x + 3).
  3. Rewrite. The first fraction already has the LCD. The second is missing (x − 3):
    (2)/(x + 3) · (x − 3)/(x − 3) = [2(x − 3)] / [(x − 3)(x + 3)]
  4. Subtract, with parentheses. The numerator becomes x − [2(x − 3)]. Distribute inside first: 2(x − 3) = 2x − 6. Now subtract the whole thing: x − (2x − 6) = x − 2x + 6 = −x + 6, which we can also write as 6 − x.
  5. Answer. (6 − x) / [(x − 3)(x + 3)], with x ≠ 3 and x ≠ −3.

Check at x = 0. Original: 0/(0 − 9) − 2/(0 + 3) = 0 − 2/3 = −2/3. Answer form: (6 − 0) / [(0 − 3)(0 + 3)] = 6/(−9) = −2/3. Match.

The minus sign belongs to the whole numerator. When you subtract, put the second numerator in parentheses before you do anything else: x − (2x − 6), not x − 2x − 6. Forgetting to distribute that minus across every term is the single most common error in this entire chapter, and it produces an answer that looks perfectly reasonable — which is exactly why it survives to the final line.
Interactive A step-by-step LCD machine: factor every denominator into tiles, stack them into bins to see why the LCD takes each factor's highest power, then watch the missing factors light up as the multiplier that rewrites each fraction. Open full ↑
Key points
  • Like denominators: combine numerators, keep the denominator, then simplify.
  • Build the LCD from factored denominators: every distinct factor, raised to its highest power.
  • Rewrite each fraction by multiplying top and bottom by the missing factor — that is multiplying by 1.
  • When subtracting, parenthesize the second numerator and distribute the minus sign.

Section 4Complex fractions

Graph of a rational function on a labeled coordinate plane
Reference. The graph of a rational function — the kind of tidy expression a messy complex fraction collapses into. Source and licence: see the figure credits

What a complex fraction is

A complex fraction (sometimes called a compound fraction) is a fraction that has fractions inside it — in the numerator, the denominator, or both. It looks intimidating and it is not. Here is one:

[ (1)/(x) + (1)/(3) ]  ÷  [ (1)/(x) − (1)/(3) ]

Written stacked with a long horizontal bar, that same expression is a complex fraction; written with a division sign, as above, it is obviously just a division problem. That is the whole secret: the main fraction bar means "divided by." There are two standard ways to untangle one, and both give the same answer.

Method 1 — combine, then divide

Turn the numerator into a single fraction. Turn the denominator into a single fraction. Then divide, which means multiply by the reciprocal. This method uses only skills from Sections 2 and 3.

Worked example 7, Method 1. Simplify [ (1)/(x) + (1)/(3) ] ÷ [ (1)/(x) − (1)/(3) ].

  1. Combine the top. LCD of x and 3 is 3x. (1)/(x) = (3)/(3x) and (1)/(3) = (x)/(3x). Sum: (3 + x)/(3x).
  2. Combine the bottom. Same LCD: (3)/(3x) − (x)/(3x) = (3 − x)/(3x).
  3. Divide. [(3 + x)/(3x)] ÷ [(3 − x)/(3x)] = [(3 + x)/(3x)] · [(3x)/(3 − x)]
  4. Cancel. The 3x on top cancels the 3x on the bottom, leaving (3 + x)/(3 − x).
  5. Restrictions. x ≠ 0 (it sits under a 1 in the original). Also the bottom of the big fraction may not be zero: (1)/(x) − (1)/(3) = 0 when x = 3, so x ≠ 3.

Method 2 — multiply top and bottom by the LCD

Find the LCD of all the little fractions inside, then multiply the whole numerator and the whole denominator by it. Every small fraction gets wiped out in one stroke. This is usually faster.

Worked example 7, Method 2. Same problem, other route. The little fractions are 1/x and 1/3, so the LCD is 3x.

  1. Multiply the numerator by 3x, distributing. 3x · [(1)/(x) + (1)/(3)] = 3x · (1)/(x) + 3x · (1)/(3) = 3 + x.
  2. Multiply the denominator by 3x, distributing. 3x · [(1)/(x) − (1)/(3)] = 3 − x.
  3. Assemble. (3 + x)/(3 − x) — identical to Method 1, with the same restrictions x ≠ 0 and x ≠ 3.

Check at x = 1. Top of the original: 1/1 + 1/3 = 4/3. Bottom: 1/1 − 1/3 = 2/3. Divide: (4/3) ÷ (2/3) = (4/3) · (3/2) = 12/6 = 2. Simplified form: (3 + 1)/(3 − 1) = 4/2 = 2. Match, both methods confirmed.

Worked example 8. Simplify [ 1 − (9)/(x2) ] ÷ [ 1 + (3)/(x) ] using Method 2.

  1. Find the LCD of the inner fractions. Denominators are x2 and x; the highest power of x is x2, so the LCD is x2.
  2. Multiply the numerator by x2. x2 · 1 − x2 · (9)/(x2) = x2 − 9.
  3. Multiply the denominator by x2. x2 · 1 + x2 · (3)/(x) = x2 + 3x.
  4. Now simplify the ordinary rational expression. (x2 − 9)/(x2 + 3x) = [(x − 3)(x + 3)] / [x(x + 3)] = (x − 3)/(x).
  5. Restrictions. x ≠ 0 from the inner denominators. The bottom of the big fraction, 1 + (3)/(x), equals zero when x = −3, so x ≠ −3 as well.

Check at x = 1. Top: 1 − 9/1 = −8. Bottom: 1 + 3/1 = 4. Divide: −8/4 = −2. Simplified: (1 − 3)/1 = −2. Match.

 Method 1: combine then divideMethod 2: multiply by the LCD
Step 1Combine the numerator into one fractionFind the LCD of every small fraction inside
Step 2Combine the denominator into one fractionMultiply the entire numerator by that LCD
Step 3Flip the bottom fraction and multiplyMultiply the entire denominator by that LCD
Step 4Factor and cancelFactor and cancel
Best whenTop and bottom are already single fractionsThere are several small fractions to clear
Watch out forFlipping the wrong fractionForgetting to distribute the LCD to every term
Restrictions hide in three places. In a complex fraction you must exclude any value that (1) makes an inner denominator zero, (2) makes the main denominator zero, or (3) makes a denominator of your final answer zero. In Worked example 8 those were x = 0, x = −3, and x = 0 again. Writing all three out takes ten seconds and is the difference between a correct answer and an almost-correct one.
Interactive Run both standard methods for simplifying a complex fraction โ€” combine-then-divide and multiply-by-the-LCD โ€” side by side on the same expression, one highlighted step at a time, then slide x along a graph to watch the original and the simplified answer agree everywhere except at the open holes that the excluded values punch out. Open full ↑
Key points
  • A complex fraction has fractions inside its numerator, denominator, or both.
  • The main fraction bar is a division sign — that reframing alone solves most of the confusion.
  • Method 1: combine top, combine bottom, multiply by the reciprocal.
  • Method 2: multiply top and bottom by the LCD of all inner fractions; usually faster.

Section 5Rational equations

Balance scale illustrating that both sides of an equation may be multiplied or divided by the same quantity
Reference. An equation as a balance — multiplying both sides by the same nonzero quantity keeps it level, which is exactly how we clear denominators. Source and licence: see the figure credits

An equation is a different job than an expression

Sections 1 through 4 asked you to simplify — to rewrite one expression in a tidier equivalent form. A rational equation asks something different: find the values of the variable that make a statement true. An equation has an equals sign, and that equals sign gives you a power you do not have with expressions — you may multiply both sides by the same nonzero quantity. Choose the LCD as that quantity and every denominator disappears at once.

The procedure is short:

  1. Factor all denominators and list the excluded values first. This step is not optional here; it is the whole safety net.
  2. Find the LCD of every denominator in the equation.
  3. Multiply every term on both sides by the LCD and cancel, leaving an equation with no fractions.
  4. Solve the resulting linear or quadratic equation.
  5. Compare each candidate to your excluded list. Any candidate that appears there is an extraneous solution and must be thrown out.

A full solution, start to finish

Worked example 9. Solve (2)/(x + 1) + (1)/(x − 1) = (4)/(x2 − 1).

  1. Factor and exclude. x2 − 1 = (x − 1)(x + 1). The denominators are (x + 1), (x − 1), and (x − 1)(x + 1), so x ≠ 1 and x ≠ −1.
  2. LCD. The distinct factors are (x − 1) and (x + 1), each to the first power: LCD = (x − 1)(x + 1).
  3. Multiply every term by the LCD.
    First term: (x − 1)(x + 1) · (2)/(x + 1) → the (x + 1) cancels → 2(x − 1)
    Second term: (x − 1)(x + 1) · (1)/(x − 1) → the (x − 1) cancels → (x + 1)
    Right side: (x − 1)(x + 1) · (4)/[(x − 1)(x + 1)] → everything cancels → 4
  4. The fraction-free equation. 2(x − 1) + (x + 1) = 4
  5. Solve it. Distribute: 2x − 2 + x + 1 = 4. Combine like terms: 3x − 1 = 4. Add 1 to both sides: 3x = 5. Divide by 3: x = 5/3.
  6. Screen against the excluded list. Is 5/3 equal to 1 or −1? No. It survives.

Verify in the original equation with x = 5/3. Then x + 1 = 8/3, x − 1 = 2/3, and x2 − 1 = 25/9 − 9/9 = 16/9.
Left side: 2 ÷ (8/3) = 2 · (3/8) = 6/8 = 3/4. And 1 ÷ (2/3) = 3/2 = 6/4. Sum: 3/4 + 6/4 = 9/4.
Right side: 4 ÷ (16/9) = 4 · (9/16) = 36/16 = 9/4.
Both sides equal 9/4, so x = 5/3 is the solution.

Extraneous solutions, and why they appear

Multiplying both sides by the LCD is legal only when the LCD is not zero — and at an excluded value, it is zero. So the fraction-free equation you produce is not quite the same equation you started with; it can be true at values where the original was never even defined. Those impostors are extraneous solutions. They are not mistakes in your algebra; they are a predictable side effect of the method, which is precisely why the final screening step is mandatory.

Worked example 10. Solve (x2)/(x − 3) = (9)/(x − 3).

  1. Exclude. x − 3 = 0 when x = 3, so x ≠ 3. Write it down now.
  2. LCD. Both denominators are (x − 3), so the LCD is (x − 3).
  3. Multiply both sides by (x − 3). On the left, (x − 3) · (x2)/(x − 3) = x2. On the right, (x − 3) · (9)/(x − 3) = 9. The equation becomes x2 = 9.
  4. Solve. Subtract 9: x2 − 9 = 0. Factor: (x − 3)(x + 3) = 0. Candidates: x = 3 and x = −3.
  5. Screen. x = 3 is on the excluded list — it is extraneous and gets crossed out. Substituting it into the original would give 9/0, which is undefined. x = −3 is not excluded, so it stays.
  6. Verify x = −3. Left: (−3)2/(−3 − 3) = 9/(−6) = −3/2. Right: 9/(−3 − 3) = 9/(−6) = −3/2. Equal.

Solution: x = −3 only. Notice that a perfectly sound algebraic process handed you two candidates and one of them was a fake. If you had skipped step 5 you would have reported an answer that makes the original equation meaningless.

Sometimes every candidate is extraneous. Solve (x)/(x − 3) = (3)/(x − 3) + 2: multiplying by (x − 3) gives x = 3 + 2(x − 3) = 3 + 2x − 6 = 2x − 3, so −x = −3 and x = 3. But x ≠ 3. Every candidate is rejected, so the honest answer is no solution — which is a complete, correct answer, not a sign you did something wrong.

Where these equations come from

Rational equations show up whenever quantities combine as rates. Suppose one pump fills a tank in 6 hours and a second pump fills the same tank in 3 hours. Working together, how long do they need? In one hour the first pump does 1/6 of the job and the second does 1/3, and together they finish 1/t of the job per hour, where t is the total time. So (1)/(6) + (1)/(3) = (1)/(t), with t ≠ 0. The LCD of 6, 3, and t is 6t. Multiply every term: 6t · (1/6) = t; 6t · (1/3) = 2t; 6t · (1/t) = 6. The equation is t + 2t = 6, so 3t = 6 and t = 2 hours. Sanity check: two hours is less than the faster pump's 3 hours on its own, which is exactly what you would expect from adding help.

 Rational expressionRational equation
Has an "="?NoYes
Your jobRewrite it in simplest formFind the values that make it true
May you clear denominators?No — that would change the valueYes — multiply both sides by the LCD
Role of the LCDRewrite each fraction to combine themWipe out all denominators at once
Answer looks likeAnother expression, plus restrictionsA number, several numbers, or "no solution"
Final stepState the excluded valuesScreen candidates and discard extraneous ones
Write the excluded values before you solve, not after. Students who find restrictions at the end tend to find only the ones they still remember, and the extraneous solution slips through. Put "x ≠ …" at the top of your page as the first line of work, box it, and check every candidate against that box before you write a final answer.
Interactive A seven-step machine for rational equations โ€” list the excluded values first, clear the denominators with the LCD, then test every candidate โ€” with a live graph and draggable probe that catches extraneous answers landing on an asymptote. Open full ↑
Key points
  • To solve a rational equation, multiply every term on both sides by the LCD to clear all fractions.
  • List excluded values first, straight from the factored denominators.
  • An extraneous solution solves the cleared equation but is excluded in the original; discard it.
  • If every candidate is extraneous, the correct answer is no solution.

The chapter in one breath

  • A rational expression is a polynomial over a polynomial, and the denominator may never be zero — so every one comes with excluded values.
  • Simplify by factoring completely and dividing out common factors; you may cancel factors but never terms.
  • Restrictions come from the original denominators, and they survive even when the factor that produced them cancels.
  • Multiply straight across after factoring and cancelling; divide by flipping the divisor, which also makes the divisor's numerator an excluded value.
  • To add or subtract, build the LCD — every distinct factor to its highest power — rewrite each fraction, then combine numerators, parenthesizing when you subtract.
  • A complex fraction is just a division problem: combine top and bottom then multiply by the reciprocal, or multiply top and bottom by the LCD of the inner fractions.
  • To solve a rational equation, clear denominators by multiplying both sides by the LCD, then solve the fraction-free equation.
  • Always screen candidates against the excluded list; an extraneous solution is discarded, and if all of them go, the answer is no solution.

ReferenceWords worth knowing

A quick reference for the vocabulary in this chapter — skim it now, or circle back whenever a word slows you down.

Common denominator
A single denominator shared by two or more fractions, needed before they can be added or subtracted.
Complex fraction
A fraction whose numerator, denominator, or both contain fractions; also called a compound fraction.
Cross-multiplication
A shortcut for the special case (a)/(b) = (c)/(d): multiply to get ad = bc. It applies only when a single fraction equals a single fraction.
Denominator
The bottom of a fraction — the part that may never equal zero.
Difference of squares
The pattern a2 − b2 = (a + b)(a − b), the most frequently used factoring tool in this chapter.
Domain
The set of input values for which an expression is defined; for a rational expression, all real numbers except the excluded values.
Excluded value
Any value of the variable that makes a denominator zero and is therefore removed from the domain.
Extraneous solution
A candidate that satisfies the equation after denominators are cleared but is an excluded value of the original; it must be discarded.
Factor
A quantity being multiplied. Only factors may be divided out of a fraction — terms may not.
Fundamental principle of fractions
(ac)/(bc) = (a)/(b) whenever b ≠ 0 and c ≠ 0; the rule that permits cancelling.
Greatest common factor (GCF)
The largest factor shared by every term of a polynomial; always the first thing to pull out when factoring.
Least common denominator (LCD)
The smallest expression every denominator divides into evenly: each distinct factor raised to its highest power.
Lowest terms
The form of a rational expression in which numerator and denominator share no common factor other than 1.
Numerator
The top of a fraction.
Opposite factors
Expressions such as b − a and a − b that differ by a factor of −1, so their quotient is −1.
Polynomial
A sum of terms of the form (number)(variable raised to a whole-number power), such as x2 + x − 12.
Rational equation
An equation containing at least one rational expression; solved by clearing denominators with the LCD.
Rational expression
A quotient of two polynomials, P/Q, with Q ≠ 0.
Reciprocal
The multiplicative inverse of a fraction, formed by exchanging numerator and denominator; the reciprocal of (c)/(d) is (d)/(c).
Restriction
Another name for an excluded value, usually written alongside a simplified answer as "x ≠ …".

Check yourself

1. State the excluded values of (x + 5)/(x2 − 4x − 5), and explain why you must find them from the original denominator.
x ≠ 5 and x ≠ −1. Factor the denominator: x2 − 4x − 5 = (x − 5)(x + 1), since (−5)(1) = −5 and −5 + 1 = −4. Setting each factor to zero gives x = 5 and x = −1. You use the original denominator because simplifying can cancel a factor and make a restriction invisible — but the original expression is still undefined there.
2. Simplify (x2 − 25)/(x2 + 10x + 25) and state the restriction.
(x − 5)/(x + 5), with x ≠ −5. Numerator: x2 − 25 = (x − 5)(x + 5). Denominator: x2 + 10x + 25 = (x + 5)2. One (x + 5) divides out, leaving (x − 5)/(x + 5). Check at x = 0: original (0 − 25)/(0 + 0 + 25) = −1; simplified (0 − 5)/(0 + 5) = −1.
3. A classmate rewrites (x + 4)/4 as x by "cancelling the 4s." Show with a number that this is wrong, and name the rule being broken.
At x = 2 the true value is (2 + 4)/4 = 6/4 = 3/2, not 2. The rule broken is that you may only divide out factors, not terms. In x + 4 the 4 is added, not multiplied, so it is not a factor of the numerator and cannot cancel with the denominator's 4.
4. Simplify (2 − x)/(x2 − 4).
−1/(x + 2), with x ≠ 2 and x ≠ −2. Write 2 − x = −1(x − 2) and x2 − 4 = (x − 2)(x + 2). The (x − 2) divides out, leaving −1/(x + 2). Check at x = 0: original (2 − 0)/(0 − 4) = −1/2; simplified −1/(0 + 2) = −1/2.
5. Multiply (x2 − 1)/(x2 + 2x) · (x + 2)/(x − 1) and list all restrictions.
(x + 1)/x, with x ≠ 0, x ≠ −2, and x ≠ 1. Factor: (x − 1)(x + 1) over x(x + 2), times (x + 2) over (x − 1). The (x − 1) and (x + 2) both cancel, leaving (x + 1)/x. Check at x = 2: (4 − 1)/(4 + 4) = 3/8 and (2 + 2)/(2 − 1) = 4, so the product is (3/8)(4) = 3/2; and (2 + 1)/2 = 3/2.
6. Divide (x2 − 9)/(x + 1) ÷ (x + 3)/(x2 − 1).
(x − 3)(x − 1), with x ≠ −1, x ≠ 1, and x ≠ −3. Flip the divisor: [(x − 3)(x + 3)]/(x + 1) · [(x − 1)(x + 1)]/(x + 3). Cancel (x + 3) and (x + 1), leaving (x − 3)(x − 1). The restriction x ≠ −3 comes from the divisor's numerator, which may not be zero. Check at x = 0: (−9)/(1) = −9 divided by 3/(−1) = −3 gives 3; and (0 − 3)(0 − 1) = 3.
7. Find the LCD of (1)/(x2 − 4) and (1)/(x2 + 4x + 4). Why is it not the product of the two denominators?
LCD = (x − 2)(x + 2)2. Factored, the denominators are (x − 2)(x + 2) and (x + 2)2. The distinct factors are (x − 2) and (x + 2), and the highest power of (x + 2) anywhere is 2. Multiplying the two denominators outright would give an extra (x + 2), producing a common denominator that works but is not least — you would just have to cancel it back out.
8. Add (3)/(x + 4) + (2)/(x).
(5x + 8)/[x(x + 4)], with x ≠ 0 and x ≠ −4. LCD is x(x + 4). Rewrite: 3x/[x(x + 4)] + 2(x + 4)/[x(x + 4)]. Numerator: 3x + 2x + 8 = 5x + 8. Check at x = 1: 3/5 + 2/1 = 3/5 + 10/5 = 13/5; and (5 + 8)/[1 · 5] = 13/5.
9. Subtract (5)/(x − 2) − (3)/(x + 1), showing how you handle the minus sign.
(2x + 11)/[(x − 2)(x + 1)], with x ≠ 2 and x ≠ −1. LCD is (x − 2)(x + 1). The numerator is 5(x + 1) − [3(x − 2)] = (5x + 5) − (3x − 6) = 5x + 5 − 3x + 6 = 2x + 11. The parentheses are what force the minus to hit both terms, turning −6 into +6. Check at x = 0: 5/(−2) − 3/1 = −2.5 − 3 = −5.5; and 11/[(−2)(1)] = −5.5.
10. Simplify the complex fraction [ (2)/(x) + 1 ] ÷ [ (4)/(x2) − 1 ] by multiplying by the LCD.
x/(2 − x), with x ≠ 0, x ≠ 2, and x ≠ −2. The LCD of the inner fractions is x2. Numerator: x2(2/x) + x2(1) = 2x + x2 = x(x + 2). Denominator: x2(4/x2) − x2(1) = 4 − x2 = (2 − x)(2 + x). Cancel (x + 2), leaving x/(2 − x). Check at x = 1: (2 + 1) ÷ (4 − 1) = 3/3 = 1; and 1/(2 − 1) = 1.
11. Solve (3)/(x − 2) = (5)/(x) and verify your answer.
x = 5. Excluded values: x ≠ 2 and x ≠ 0. Multiply both sides by the LCD x(x − 2), or cross-multiply since it is one fraction equal to one fraction: 3x = 5(x − 2) = 5x − 10. Subtract 5x: −2x = −10, so x = 5, which is not excluded. Verify: 3/(5 − 2) = 3/3 = 1 and 5/5 = 1. Both sides equal 1.
12. Solve (x2)/(x + 4) = (16)/(x + 4). Explain what happens to each candidate.
x = 4 only; x = −4 is extraneous. Excluded value: x ≠ −4. Multiplying both sides by (x + 4) leaves x2 = 16, so x2 − 16 = 0 and (x − 4)(x + 4) = 0, giving candidates x = 4 and x = −4. The candidate −4 is on the excluded list — it would make both denominators zero — so it is discarded as extraneous. Verify x = 4: left 16/8 = 2, right 16/8 = 2. Equal.