📖 ContentsChapter 5 · Neuromuscular
NPTE Review · Chapter 5 · Neuromuscular

Neuromuscular Foundations: Neuroanatomy, Examination and Motor Control

Every neurologic question on the licensing exam is really a localization problem followed by a management problem: where is the lesion, what will the patient be able to do, and what is the safest, most effective intervention? This chapter builds the foundation for the neuromuscular half of the exam: the anatomy that predicts deficits, the examination that confirms them, the motor learning science that shapes treatment, the balance tests with their cutoffs, and the interventions with the strongest evidence.

By the end of this chapter you can

  • Match the cortical areas, cerebellum, basal ganglia and brainstem to their functions and predict the deficit from a lesion in each.
  • Trace the corticospinal tract, dorsal column medial lemniscus and spinothalamic tract, state where each crosses, and use that to predict ipsilateral or contralateral signs.
  • Screen all twelve cranial nerves and name the arterial territory most likely involved from a cluster of findings.
  • Perform and grade a neurologic examination: sensation, deep tendon reflexes, the Modified Ashworth Scale, coordination tests and upper versus lower motor neuron signs.
  • Apply the stages of motor learning, practice schedules, feedback types and the principles of experience dependent neuroplasticity to a treatment plan.
  • Explain the systems model of balance, the ankle, hip and stepping strategies, and the six conditions of the Sensory Organization Test.
  • Recall the usual exam cutoffs for the Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up and Go, Dynamic Gait Index, Functional Gait Assessment, functional reach and gait speed.
  • Choose among task specific training, constraint induced movement therapy, body weight supported treadmill training and functional electrical stimulation, including eligibility, dosage and contraindications.

Section 1Neuroanatomy that the exam tests

The exam asks you to read a vignette, recognize the pattern of deficits and connect it to a structure and a blood supply. For each system, ask what it normally does and what a patient looks like when it fails.

The cerebral cortex

Each hemisphere has four lobes on its lateral surface (frontal, parietal, temporal and occipital) plus the limbic lobe and insula, which lie deep or medial. The central sulcus separates the frontal lobe (motor planning and execution) from the parietal lobe (sensation and spatial processing). The lateral (Sylvian) fissure separates the frontal and parietal lobes above from the temporal lobe below.

The primary motor cortex (precentral gyrus, Brodmann area 4) contains the cell bodies of many upper motor neurons. Its body map, the motor homunculus, places the leg and foot on the medial surface of the hemisphere inside the longitudinal fissure, and the trunk, arm, hand and face progressively more lateral, with the face just above the lateral fissure. That layout explains why anterior cerebral artery strokes cause leg greater than arm weakness and middle cerebral artery strokes cause face and arm greater than leg weakness.

The premotor cortex and supplementary motor area plan and sequence movement and set up anticipatory postural adjustments; lesions cause apraxia and poor initiation. The prefrontal cortex governs executive function, so frontal damage brings impulsivity, perseveration and poor insight, which matter more for safety than strength. The dominant hemisphere (left in almost all right handed and most left handed people) holds the language areas. The nondominant (usually right) inferior parietal lobule governs spatial attention, so damage there produces unilateral neglect and anosognosia. The limbic system links emotion, motivation and memory, which is why lability and memory loss are common after brain injury. Figure 5.1 maps the main areas.

FrontalParietalTemporalOccip. Premotor and SMA (6) Primary motor (4) Primary somatosensory (3,1,2) Broca area (44, 45) Primary auditory (41, 42) Wernicke (22) Primary visual (17) Cerebellum Brainstem AnteriorPosterior CS
Figure 5.1 Functional areas of the left (dominant) hemisphere, lateral view, front to the left. CS marks the central sulcus between the red motor strip and the blue sensory strip. Broca and Wernicke areas sit on either side of the lateral fissure; the visual cortex is mostly on the medial surface at the occipital pole.

The long tracts and where they cross

Three tracts answer most lateralization questions. The rule is simple: find where the tract crosses, and the side of the deficit flips at that level.

The spinocerebellar tracts carry unconscious proprioception to the ipsilateral cerebellum. The reticulospinal and vestibulospinal tracts control posture and tone; loss of cortical inhibition over them contributes to spasticity and antigravity posturing after brain injury.

Fasciculus gracilis (leg)DCML, crosses in medulla Fasciculus cuneatus (arm)DCML, crosses in medulla Lateral corticospinalcrossed at pyramids Dorsal spinocerebellaruncrossed, to cerebellum Spinothalamiccrosses within 1 to 2 segments Anterior corticospinalmostly uncrossed, axial Dorsal horn (sensory) Ventral horn (LMN cell bodies) Posterior (dorsal) Anterior (ventral)
Figure 5.2 Major tracts in a cervical cord cross section (tracts drawn on one side only). Ascending sensory tracts are blue, green and gold; descending motor tracts are red. The crossing level of each tract predicts whether a cord lesion produces ipsilateral or contralateral signs.
Board tip. In a spinal cord hemisection, the deficits split by tract: weakness and loss of vibration and proprioception on the same side as the lesion, and loss of pain and temperature on the opposite side starting a level or two lower. If a vignette describes this split, the answer is Brown-Sequard syndrome, and the tract crossing levels are the reason.

Cerebellum

The cerebellum compares intended with actual movement and corrects errors in timing, force and direction; it does not cause weakness. Midline lesions (vermis, flocculonodular lobe) cause truncal ataxia, wide based gait and nystagmus; lateral hemisphere lesions cause limb dysmetria, intention tremor and dysdiadochokinesia. Because the cerebellar output crosses once and the corticospinal tract crosses again, cerebellar lesions produce signs on the same side as the lesion. Other features are hypotonia, a positive rebound phenomenon, scanning or ataxic dysarthria, and a gait that does not improve much with vision (contrast with sensory ataxia).

Basal ganglia

The basal ganglia (caudate and putamen, which form the striatum; globus pallidus; subthalamic nucleus; substantia nigra) select desired movements and suppress unwanted ones through a loop with the cortex and thalamus. In the simplified model, the direct pathway facilitates movement and the indirect pathway inhibits it. Dopamine from the substantia nigra pars compacta excites the direct pathway (D1 receptors) and inhibits the indirect pathway (D2 receptors), so its net effect is to promote movement. Loss of dopamine in Parkinson disease produces a hypokinetic disorder: bradykinesia, rigidity, resting tremor and postural instability. Degeneration of the caudate in Huntington disease and a lesion of the subthalamic nucleus (contralateral hemiballismus) produce hyperkinetic disorders. External cues help because automatic, internally cued movement is impaired.

Brainstem and cranial nerves

The brainstem (midbrain, pons, medulla) contains the cranial nerve nuclei, all of the long tracts, the reticular activating system for arousal, and centers for breathing, heart rate and blood pressure. A brainstem lesion is suggested by crossed findings: an ipsilateral cranial nerve deficit with contralateral weakness or sensory loss in the body, often with vertigo, diplopia, dysarthria, dysphagia or ataxia. Cranial nerves III and IV are in the midbrain; V, VI, VII and VIII in the pons; IX, X, XI (in part) and XII in the medulla.

NerveMain functionBedside screenFinding with lesion
I OlfactorySmellIdentify a familiar odor, each nostrilAnosmia, common after frontal head injury
II OpticVisionAcuity, visual fields by confrontation, pupillary light reflex (afferent)Field cut; pattern localizes the lesion
III OculomotorMost eye movements, eyelid elevation, pupil constrictionTrack an H pattern; pupil responseEye down and out, ptosis, dilated pupil
IV TrochlearSuperior oblique (depresses the adducted eye)Look down and inVertical diplopia worse going downstairs; head tilt away
V TrigeminalFacial sensation; muscles of masticationLight touch on three divisions; clench jaw; corneal reflex (afferent)Facial numbness; jaw deviates toward the weak side
VI AbducensLateral rectusLook laterallyEye turned in; horizontal diplopia
VII FacialFacial expression, taste anterior two thirdsRaise brows, close eyes tight, smileLMN: whole half of face; UMN: lower face only, forehead spared
VIII VestibulocochlearHearing and balanceFinger rub, head impulse test, observe nystagmusHearing loss, vertigo, nystagmus
IX GlossopharyngealPharynx sensation, taste posterior thirdGag reflex (afferent)Reduced gag, dysphagia
X VagusPalate, pharynx, larynx; parasympatheticSay "ah," watch the uvula; voice qualityUvula deviates away from the lesion; hoarseness, dysphagia
XI AccessorySternocleidomastoid and upper trapeziusResisted shrug and head turnWeak shrug; shoulder droops; scapular winging (lateral)
XII HypoglossalTongue movementProtrude tongueTongue deviates toward the lesion side

Blood supply

The brain is supplied by two paired systems that join at the base in the circle of Willis. The anterior circulation comes from the internal carotid arteries, which give the anterior cerebral artery (medial frontal and parietal lobes: leg and foot area, bladder control, frontal executive areas) and the middle cerebral artery (lateral convexity: face and arm motor and sensory areas, language areas in the dominant hemisphere, spatial attention in the nondominant hemisphere, and through lenticulostriate branches the internal capsule and basal ganglia). The posterior circulation comes from the vertebral arteries, which join as the basilar artery to supply the brainstem and cerebellum and end as the two posterior cerebral arteries (occipital lobe, inferior temporal lobe, thalamus). Communicating arteries allow collateral flow. Chapter 6 matches each artery to its stroke syndrome.

Case. A 66 year old man is referred to outpatient therapy for "dizziness and clumsiness." He reports two days of vertigo. On examination his right arm overshoots on finger to nose, rapid alternating movements are slow and irregular on the right, he has a hoarse voice and difficulty swallowing, his face has decreased pain sensation on the right, and his left arm and leg have decreased pain and temperature sensation. Strength is 5/5 throughout.
Reasoning: First localize. Ipsilateral face and contralateral body sensory loss is a crossed pattern, which places the lesion in the brainstem; hoarseness and dysphagia point to the medulla (nucleus ambiguus, CN IX and X); right sided ataxia without weakness fits the right inferior cerebellar peduncle. This is a right lateral medullary (Wallenberg) syndrome from the vertebral or posterior inferior cerebellar artery. The tempting choices are a peripheral vestibular disorder (but peripheral disorders do not cause sensory loss or dysphagia) and a cerebellar hemisphere stroke alone (which would not explain the crossed sensory loss). The best action is not to start vestibular rehabilitation but to stop and refer urgently for emergency medical evaluation, because a new posterior circulation stroke can progress. New onset vertigo with any of the "D" signs (diplopia, dysarthria, dysphagia, dysmetria, drop attacks) or crossed sensory signs is a red flag.
Key point

Localize before you treat. The homunculus explains why the ACA hits the leg and the MCA hits the face and arm; the crossing levels of the corticospinal, dorsal column and spinothalamic tracts explain which side is affected; cerebellar signs are ipsilateral and never cause weakness; basal ganglia lesions disturb the amount and automaticity of movement; and crossed cranial nerve and body signs point to the brainstem and the posterior circulation, which is a medical emergency when new.

Section 2The neurologic examination

The neurologic examination localizes the problem, separates upper from lower motor neuron involvement, sets a baseline and catches findings that need referral. Begin with a systems review: arousal, orientation, ability to follow commands, communication, vital signs and red flags. A patient who cannot follow commands cannot give valid sensory or strength results.

Sensory examination

Sensation is tested in three groups. Superficial (exteroceptive) sensation includes pain (sharp versus dull with a safety pin or broken tongue depressor), temperature (warm and cold test tubes), light touch (cotton ball or fingertip) and pressure. Deep (proprioceptive) sensation includes proprioception (static joint position sense), kinesthesia (awareness of movement) and vibration (128 Hz tuning fork over a bony prominence). Combined cortical sensation includes stereognosis (identifying an object by touch), graphesthesia (recognizing numbers traced on the skin), two point discrimination, tactile localization, barognosis (weight) and recognition of texture, and bilateral simultaneous stimulation (extinction, a sign of neglect).

Technique rules: demonstrate with vision, then occlude vision; apply stimuli randomly and at irregular intervals; compare sides; and test superficial before deep and cortical sensation, because cortical tests mean little if primary sensation is absent. Pain and temperature test the anterolateral system; vibration and proprioception test the dorsal columns. In diabetes, inability to feel the 5.07 (10 gram) monofilament means loss of protective sensation. Patterns localize: dermatomal (root), named nerve field, stocking and glove (polyneuropathy), a trunk sensory level (cord), or one whole side including the face (contralateral thalamus, capsule or cortex).

Reflexes

Deep tendon reflexes (muscle stretch reflexes) test a monosynaptic arc: muscle spindle, Ia afferent, the spinal segment, the alpha motor neuron and the muscle. Descending pathways normally damp the arc. A lower motor neuron or sensory lesion breaks the arc and reduces the reflex; an upper motor neuron lesion removes inhibition and exaggerates it. Use reinforcement (Jendrassik maneuver) before calling a reflex absent.

GradeResponseMeaning
0No response, even with reinforcementLMN lesion, root or nerve lesion, or spinal shock
1+Diminished, low normalMay be normal; abnormal if asymmetric
2+Average, normalNormal
3+Brisker than averageMay be normal; suspect UMN if asymmetric or with other signs
4+Very brisk, hyperactive, often with clonusUMN lesion
ReflexMain root levelPathologic reflexPositive sign and meaning
BicepsC5 (C6)BabinskiGreat toe extension and toe fanning on stroking the lateral sole: corticospinal lesion (normal in infants)
BrachioradialisC6HoffmannThumb and index flexion on flicking the middle fingernail: UMN lesion at or above the cervical cord
TricepsC7ClonusRhythmic beats on a quick sustained stretch (ankle is classic); more than three to five beats is abnormal
PatellarL4 (L3)ChaddockToe extension on stroking the lateral malleolus: same meaning as Babinski
Medial hamstringL5OppenheimToe extension on stroking down the medial tibia
AchillesS1Superficial abdominalsAbsent in UMN lesions above the segment (and in some normal people)

Tone and spasticity

Tone is the resistance of a relaxed muscle to passive stretch. Spasticity is a velocity dependent increase in resistance to passive stretch caused by hyperexcitable stretch reflexes after an upper motor neuron lesion; it may show a clasp knife response (high resistance that suddenly gives way). It favors upper extremity flexors and lower extremity extensors. Rigidity is increased resistance that is not velocity dependent and is present in both agonist and antagonist; lead pipe rigidity is uniform through the range and cogwheel rigidity is ratchety (tremor superimposed on rigidity), typical of Parkinson disease. Hypotonia or flaccidity follows lower motor neuron or cerebellar lesions and the early shock phase of stroke and spinal cord injury. Decorticate (arms flexed, legs extended) and decerebrate (all four extremities extended) posturing are described in Chapter 6.

Spasticity is graded with the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), testing with the patient relaxed and supine and moving the limb through the range in about one second. The Modified Tardieu Scale compares the catch angle at fast stretch (R1) with slow passive range (R2); a large gap suggests a reflex component, a small gap suggests contracture.

MAS gradeDescription
0No increase in tone
1Slight increase: a catch and release, or minimal resistance at the end of the range
1+Slight increase: a catch followed by minimal resistance through less than half of the remaining range
2More marked increase through most of the range, but the part is easily moved
3Considerable increase; passive movement is difficult
4The part is rigid in flexion or extension

Coordination

Coordination tests separate cerebellar, sensory and basal ganglia problems. Nonequilibrium tests are done sitting or lying: finger to nose, finger to therapist's finger, heel to shin, rapid alternating movements such as pronation and supination (inability is dysdiadochokinesia), finger tapping and foot tapping, drawing a circle, and the rebound test (the limb overshoots when resistance is suddenly released). Observe for dysmetria (overshoot or undershoot), intention tremor (increasing as the target nears, cerebellar), resting tremor (decreasing with movement, basal ganglia) and decomposition of movement. Test with eyes open and then closed: a sensory ataxia worsens dramatically without vision, whereas cerebellar ataxia changes little. Equilibrium tests are done standing and walking: the Romberg test (feet together, eyes open then closed; positive if balance is maintained with eyes open but lost with eyes closed, indicating a proprioceptive or vestibular problem, not cerebellar), the sharpened (tandem) Romberg, single limb stance, tandem walking and walking with sudden stops and turns.

Motor cortex Internal capsule Brainstem, pyramids Anterior horn cell Muscle nerve Upper motor neuron lesion Spasticity, velocity dependent (clasp knife) Hyperreflexia, clonus, Babinski and Hoffmann Weakness in patterns (synergies), not single muscles Little or slow disuse atrophy, no fasciculations Contralateral if above decussation Examples: stroke, TBI, MS, SCI, ALS (UMN part) Lower motor neuron lesion Flaccidity, hyporeflexia or areflexia Early marked atrophy, fasciculations, fibrillations on EMG Weakness in a root, nerve or myotome distribution Examples: radiculopathy, neuropathy, Guillain Barre, polio
Figure 5.3 The upper motor neuron runs from the cortex to the anterior horn cell; the lower motor neuron runs from the anterior horn cell to the muscle. The side of the lesion on this chain predicts the cluster of signs. ALS damages both and shows a mixed picture.

Upper versus lower motor neuron signs

A stroke and a peroneal nerve palsy can both cause foot drop, but the stroke patient has a brisk ankle jerk, clonus and plantarflexor spasticity, while the palsy patient has a flaccid foot, anterior compartment atrophy and a nerve pattern of sensory loss. A spinal cord injury gives LMN signs at the injured level and UMN signs below it once spinal shock resolves. ALS mixes both in the same limb.

Cranial nerve screening and other components

Cranial nerve screening (table in Section 1) focuses on findings that change management: visual field loss, nystagmus and eye movement problems, facial weakness pattern, and dysphagia signs such as a wet voice or coughing with swallowing, which call for speech language pathology referral and aspiration precautions. The full examination also covers cognition, communication, perception, motor function, balance and gait.

Board tip. Manual muscle testing assumes isolated control. In a patient with strong flexor synergy after stroke, a "4/5 biceps" is misleading because the force comes from a mass pattern; the exam expects you to describe motor control (for example, Brunnstrom stage or Fugl-Meyer score) instead of reporting MMT grades. Likewise, the Romberg tests sensory inputs, not the cerebellum.
Case. A 52 year old woman reports six months of progressive hand weakness and frequent tripping. Examination shows atrophy and visible fasciculations of the intrinsic hand muscles bilaterally, 4+ patellar reflexes with three beats of ankle clonus, a positive Hoffmann sign, and normal sensation in all modalities.
Reasoning: Classify each sign. Atrophy and fasciculations are lower motor neuron signs; hyperreflexia, clonus and Hoffmann are upper motor neuron signs; sensation is spared. Mixed UMN and LMN signs with normal sensation is the classic presentation of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. A cervical myelopathy can also mix signs (LMN at the level, UMN below) and must be excluded, but it usually produces some sensory change, so the best answer is that the findings are most consistent with motor neuron disease and require physician referral for diagnosis. A peripheral neuropathy is wrong because it causes hyporeflexia and sensory loss. Safety point: progressive neurologic findings that do not fit a musculoskeletal pattern need referral before a plan of care continues.
Key point

Test in a logical order (cognition and safety first, superficial before cortical sensation, reflexes and tone before function), compare sides, and interpret findings as patterns. Velocity dependent resistance is spasticity, velocity independent resistance is rigidity, and both differ from contracture. Upper motor neuron lesions give spasticity, hyperreflexia and pathologic reflexes; lower motor neuron lesions give flaccidity, hyporeflexia, atrophy and fasciculations; mixed signs suggest ALS or a cord lesion at and below the level.

Section 3Motor control and motor learning

Motor control is the ability to regulate the mechanisms essential to movement: posture, stability and the coordination of muscles across joints. Motor learning is a set of internal processes, associated with practice or experience, that produce a relatively permanent change in the capability for skilled movement. The difference matters on the exam. Performance is what you see during practice, and it can be inflated by guidance and frequent feedback or depressed by fatigue. Learning is inferred from retention (performance after a rest period without practice) and transfer (performance of a related task or in a new setting). Conditions that depress in-session performance often produce better learning.

Theories of motor control

Older reflex and hierarchical theories (cortex in charge, reflexes released when higher control is lost) underlie the neurofacilitation approaches. The current systems and dynamic systems theories hold that movement emerges from the interaction of the individual, the task and the environment, and that changing a control parameter such as speed can shift the pattern (walking becomes running). So train functional tasks in meaningful environments and manipulate task constraints, rather than expecting normalized tone alone to restore function. Open loop control runs a preprogrammed command without feedback (fast, ballistic movements); closed loop control uses ongoing sensory feedback to correct movement (slow, accurate tasks and early learning).

Stages of motor learning

Stage (Fitts and Posner)Learner characteristicsTherapist strategies
CognitiveFiguring out what to do; many errors, variable and inefficient performance; high attention demand; relies on visionClear demonstration and simple verbal instruction; frequent feedback, including knowledge of performance; blocked practice; guided movement; closed, quiet environment; break complex tasks into parts if needed
AssociativeRefining how to do it; fewer, more consistent errors; begins to detect own errors; increasing reliance on proprioceptionReduce and fade feedback; promote self assessment before giving feedback; shift toward random and variable practice; gradually add environmental challenge
AutonomousPerformance is automatic and consistent; little attention needed; can do a secondary task at the same timeMinimal, occasional feedback; random practice in varied, open environments; dual task training; community and real world settings

Gentile's two stage model starts with getting the idea of the movement, then moves to fixation (refining one consistent pattern for closed skills in a stable environment) or diversification (building adaptable patterns for open skills in a changing environment). Progressing from closed to open tasks, and from body stability to transport with manipulation, is a principled way to advance a program.

Practice schedules

VariableOptionsBest use
Order of tasksBlocked (repeat one task many times, AAA BBB CCC) versus random (mixed order, ABC BCA CAB)Blocked for initial acquisition and for patients with cognitive impairment; random for retention and transfer once the movement is understood (contextual interference effect)
Rest distributionMassed (practice time greater than rest) versus distributed (rest equal to or greater than practice)Distributed for patients with low endurance, poor motivation, fatigue (MS) or risk of injury; massed is efficient when fatigue is not a concern, as in constraint induced therapy
VariabilityConstant (same version every trial) versus variable (different heights, speeds, surfaces)Variable practice builds a generalized motor program and improves transfer to new situations
Task divisionWhole versus part practiceWhole for continuous skills such as walking; part for discrete, serial tasks with separable steps such as a wheelchair transfer (practice locking brakes, scooting, pivoting, then combine)
Physical versus mentalMental practice (cognitive rehearsal or motor imagery)Adds to physical practice; useful when fatigue, pain or safety limits repetitions
GuidanceManual or verbal guidance versus discovery learning with errors allowedGuidance early for safety and to convey the idea; withdraw it, because heavy guidance makes the learner dependent and reduces retention

The contextual interference effect explains why random practice beats blocked practice for learning. Switching tasks forces the learner to reconstruct the action plan on each trial and to compare tasks, which is effortful and lowers performance during the session but strengthens memory for each skill. Blocked practice lets the learner repeat the same plan from working memory, which looks good in the session and fades by the next visit.

Performance (higher is better) Acquisition (practice sessions) Retention test (after a delay, no practice) Blocked practice Random practice better learning drops off
Figure 5.4 The contextual interference effect. Blocked practice (red) looks better during the session; random practice (teal) retains better after a delay. Learning is judged on the retention and transfer tests, not on in-session performance.

Feedback

Intrinsic feedback comes from the learner's own senses (proprioception, vision, vestibular input). Extrinsic (augmented) feedback comes from an outside source: the therapist, a mirror, a video or a biofeedback device. Extrinsic feedback is described along several dimensions.

Board tip. When a question asks which feedback schedule best promotes long term retention, choose the reduced option: faded, bandwidth or summary feedback, KR rather than continuous concurrent KP, and random rather than blocked practice. When it asks what to do on day one with a confused patient learning a new transfer, choose the supportive option: demonstration, guidance, blocked practice and frequent feedback.

Principles of experience dependent neuroplasticity

Recovery after a lesion combines spontaneous recovery (resolving edema, reperfusion of the penumbra, reversal of diaschisis) and experience dependent plasticity (synaptogenesis, sprouting, unmasking of latent pathways, cortical map reorganization). Regaining the original pattern is restitution; reaching the goal another way is compensation. A widely cited synthesis lists ten principles.

PrincipleMeaning for treatment
Use it or lose itFunctions not driven will degrade; avoid prolonged nonuse of the affected limb
Use it and improve itTraining that drives a function enhances it
SpecificityThe nature of the training determines the plasticity; practice the skill you want
Repetition mattersLasting change needs many repetitions, often hundreds per session, far above typical clinical doses
Intensity mattersSufficient intensity (effort, heart rate, challenge) is needed to induce change
Time mattersDifferent forms of plasticity occur at different times after injury; there may be windows of heightened responsiveness, while very early, very intense use can sometimes worsen a lesion in animal models
Salience mattersTraining must be meaningful and rewarding to the patient
Age mattersPlasticity occurs more readily in younger brains, but older adults still respond
TransferencePlasticity from one training experience can enhance related behaviors
InterferencePlasticity in one direction can block other learning, for example a learned compensatory pattern that interferes with recovery of the normal one

Learned nonuse is a classic illustration of interference and of use it or lose it: after a stroke, early failed attempts to use the affected arm are punished, successful use of the other arm is rewarded, and the patient stops trying the affected arm even after motor capacity returns.

Case. A 74 year old man two weeks after a left MCA stroke has mild expressive aphasia and moderate right hemiparesis. He is learning to transfer from wheelchair to bed. He forgets to lock the brakes and pushes up from the armrest only after several cues. His daughter asks how to help him practice at home.
Reasoning: He is in the cognitive stage of learning a serial task, and aphasia limits verbal instruction. Best choices: demonstrate and use short, consistent cues or gestures; use part practice for the trouble steps (brakes, scoot forward, feet back) then combine them into the whole transfer; use blocked practice and frequent feedback at first; and keep the environment consistent. Teach the daughter the same sequence of cues. Random practice with summary feedback is the right goal later, but it is the wrong choice now because errors in a transfer are a fall risk. Safety point: practice with a gait belt and a locked chair until he reliably initiates brake locking himself.
Key point

Learning is shown by retention and transfer, not by performance in the session. Match the practice and feedback to the stage: early learners need demonstration, guidance, blocked practice and frequent feedback; later learners need random and variable practice, faded or summary feedback and real world challenge. Plasticity is driven by specific, repetitive, intense and meaningful practice, and nonuse or poor compensatory habits work against recovery.

Section 4Balance and fall risk

Balance (postural control) is the ability to keep the body's center of mass over its base of support. It has a static component (holding a posture), a dynamic component (controlling the center of mass during movement), a reactive component (recovering from an unexpected perturbation) and an anticipatory component (preparing the body before a voluntary movement, such as activating the trunk before reaching).

The systems model of balance

Balance emerges from interacting systems, any of which can be the limiting factor: sensory input (somatosensory input dominates on a firm surface in good light; vision reports head position relative to the surroundings; vestibular input reports head position relative to gravity and resolves conflicts when the other two are inaccurate), central integration that reweights inputs, motor output (ankle and hip strength, ankle dorsiflexion range, timing of responses), cognition (attention and dual tasking) and biomechanics (base of support and limits of stability).

Postural strategies

StrategyWhen it is usedMuscle activationNotes
AnkleSmall, slow perturbations on a firm, broad surfaceDistal to proximal (for a backward sway: tibialis anterior, quadriceps, abdominals)Needs intact ankle range, strength and foot sensation; body moves as an inverted pendulum about the ankle
HipLarger or faster perturbations, or a narrow or compliant surface (beam, foam)Proximal to distal (hip and trunk muscles first)Moves the center of mass by flexing or extending at the hips; overused in older adults with weak ankles
SteppingPerturbation pushes the center of mass beyond the base of supportRapid step or reach to create a new baseSlow or absent steps predict falls; train protective stepping in all directions

Sensory organization testing

The Sensory Organization Test (SOT), performed on computerized dynamic posturography, measures sway under six conditions that systematically remove or distort visual and somatosensory input. Sway referencing means the platform or visual surround tilts in step with the patient's sway, so the input is present but inaccurate. The modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction in Balance (mCTSIB) is the clinical version: the patient stands for 30 seconds on a firm surface with eyes open, firm with eyes closed, foam with eyes open, and foam with eyes closed. Standing on foam degrades somatosensory input; closing the eyes removes vision.

Eyes openEyes closedSway referencedvision Fixedsupport Swayreferencedsupport 123 456 VisionSomatosensoryVestibular SomatosensoryVestibular SomatosensoryVestibular VisionVestibular Vestibular only Vestibular only Each cell lists the inputs that remain accurate.
Figure 5.5 The six conditions of the Sensory Organization Test. Patients who rely on vision fall in conditions 2, 3, 5 and 6; patients who rely on somatosensation fall in 4, 5 and 6; patients with vestibular loss fall in 5 and 6. The clinical mCTSIB approximates conditions 1, 2, 4 and 5 using foam.

Standardized balance and fall risk tests

Choose a test that matches the patient's level and the question being asked. Cutoffs vary by study; these are the values usually taught for community dwelling older adults.

TestWhat it involvesScoringUsual fall risk cutoff
Berg Balance Scale14 static and dynamic tasks (sit to stand, standing unsupported, reaching, turning 360 degrees, stool stepping, tandem and single leg stance)0 to 4 each, maximum 56Below 45 indicates increased fall risk; ceiling effect in higher level patients
Timed Up and GoRise from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn, return, sitSeconds13.5 seconds or more (community older adults); 12 seconds or more is a common screening threshold; adding a cognitive or manual task (TUG cognitive) detects dual task deficits
Dynamic Gait Index8 gait tasks: speed changes, head turns, pivot, obstacles, stairs0 to 3 each, maximum 2419 or less
Functional Gait Assessment10 items, a revision of the DGI adding narrow base, eyes closed and backward walkingMaximum 3022 or less
Functional reachMaximal forward reach in standing without steppingInches or centimetersLess than 6 inches suggests high risk (about four times); 6 to 10 inches moderate (about twice)
Tinetti POMABalance and gait subscalesMaximum 2818 or less high risk; 19 to 23 moderate risk
Five Times Sit to StandFive chair rises as fast as possible, arms crossedSecondsMore than about 12 to 15 seconds, depending on the study
Four Square Step TestStep forward, sideways and backward over canes in a cross patternSecondsMore than 15 seconds in older adults
Activities specific Balance Confidence (ABC)Self rated confidence in 16 activities0 to 100 percentBelow 67 percent suggests fall risk
Mini-BESTest14 items covering anticipatory, reactive, sensory and dynamic gaitMaximum 28Cutoffs vary by diagnosis; strong for Parkinson disease

Gait speed as a vital sign

Comfortable gait speed, usually measured with the 10 Meter Walk Test over the middle 6 meters to exclude acceleration and deceleration, is fast, reliable and predictive of falls, hospitalization, discharge destination and survival. Classic categories from stroke research: below 0.4 m/s suggests a household ambulator, 0.4 to 0.8 m/s a limited community ambulator, and above 0.8 m/s a community ambulator. A speed below about 1.0 m/s in older adults flags increased risk of adverse outcomes, and crossing a street safely at a timed signal typically requires about 1.2 m/s or more. A change of about 0.1 m/s is commonly cited as a meaningful change.

Householdambulator Limited communityambulator Community ambulator 00.20.40.60.81.01.21.4 Comfortable gait speed (m/s), 10 Meter Walk Test Below 1.0: higher risk of falls and poor outcomes (older adults) About 1.2 or more: street crossing
Figure 5.6 Gait speed categories commonly used on the exam. The 0.4 and 0.8 m/s thresholds come from stroke studies of household and community walking; about 0.1 m/s is a meaningful change for most populations.

Fall risk factors and prevention

Falls are multifactorial. Intrinsic risk factors include a history of falls (the strongest single predictor), lower extremity weakness, gait and balance impairment, visual impairment, peripheral neuropathy, cognitive impairment, depression, orthostatic hypotension, urinary urgency and incontinence, foot problems, and fear of falling. Medications are a major modifiable factor: psychoactive drugs (sedatives, hypnotics, antidepressants, antipsychotics), antihypertensives, opioids, and polypharmacy (often defined as four or more medications). Extrinsic factors include poor lighting, loose rugs, clutter, lack of grab bars, unsafe footwear and stairs without rails.

Prevention follows a screen, assess, intervene sequence: ask about falls in the past year, unsteadiness and fear of falling; assess gait, strength, balance, orthostatic blood pressure, vision, feet and home hazards, and request a medication review by the prescriber. The most effective single intervention is progressive, challenging balance exercise, about three hours per week over months, usually with strengthening (structured home programs and tai chi both reduce falls). Add home modification, footwear, vision correction, management of orthostatic hypotension and vitamin D for those who are deficient. Walking alone, without balance challenge, does not reliably prevent falls.

Board tip. Know which test fits the question. A frail patient who cannot walk without an assistive device: Berg (static and transitional tasks). A high functioning patient or one with vestibular complaints: DGI or FGA (head turns and dynamic gait). A quick screen in a busy clinic: TUG. Fear of falling: ABC scale. Fall risk "in Parkinson disease": the Mini-BESTest. A sensory question: mCTSIB or SOT.
Case. An 81 year old woman with type 2 diabetes is seen in home health after a fall in the bathroom at night. Berg score is 41/56, TUG is 16 seconds, she cannot feel the 10 gram monofilament on either foot, and she falls toward the floor when asked to stand with feet together and eyes closed. Her blood pressure falls from 138/76 supine to 112/68 after three minutes standing. She takes a sleeping pill.
Reasoning: Several risk factors interact: loss of protective sensation means she relies on vision, which explains the positive Romberg and the nighttime fall in the dark; she meets the definition of orthostatic hypotension (a drop of 20 mmHg or more systolic or 10 mmHg or more diastolic within three minutes); and a hypnotic adds sedation. Berg below 45 and TUG above 13.5 seconds confirm high risk. The best plan is multifactorial: progressive balance and strength training emphasizing visual and vestibular use, night lights and grab bars, slow positional changes, and communication with her physician about the orthostatic drop and the sedative. The tempting single answer "prescribe a walker" is incomplete and does not address the causes. Safety point: report the orthostatic hypotension and the medication concern to the prescriber; do not adjust medications yourself.
Key point

Balance depends on sensory input (somatosensory, visual, vestibular), central integration, motor output and cognition, so a fall has more than one cause. Use the SOT or mCTSIB to identify which sense the patient depends on, standardized tests with known cutoffs (Berg below 45, TUG 13.5 seconds or more, DGI 19 or less, FGA 22 or less) to quantify risk, and gait speed as a functional vital sign. Prevention is multifactorial, with progressive, challenging balance exercise as its core.

Section 5Neurologic outcome measures and interventions

Patients improve the tasks they practice, with enough repetitions, at enough intensity, in a meaningful context. The exam expects you to match outcome measures to questions and to know who is eligible for the highest evidence interventions and how they are dosed.

Choosing outcome measures

Classify measures by the ICF: body function (Fugl-Meyer, Modified Ashworth), activity (10 Meter Walk Test, Berg, ARAT, FIM) and participation (community mobility). Include at least one activity measure, because functional goals are written at that level. The minimal detectable change exceeds measurement error; the minimal clinically important difference is the smallest change patients perceive as meaningful.

MeasureWhat it measuresScoring and key facts
Fugl-Meyer AssessmentMotor recovery after stroke, based on the recovery sequence (reflexes, synergies, out of synergy, isolated movement)Motor total 100 (upper extremity 66, lower extremity 34); also sensation, balance, joint range and pain sections
Action Research Arm TestUpper extremity activity: grasp, grip, pinch, gross movement19 items, maximum 57
Box and Block TestGross manual dexterityBlocks moved in 60 seconds, each hand
Nine Hole Peg TestFine dexteritySeconds to place and remove 9 pegs; common in MS
10 Meter Walk TestGait speedComfortable and fast speeds; see Section 4
Six Minute Walk TestWalking enduranceDistance; stop for chest pain, severe dyspnea, pallor, leg cramps or staggering
Functional Independence MeasureBurden of care across 18 items (13 motor, 5 cognitive)Each item 1 (total assist) to 7 (complete independence); total 18 to 126
NIH Stroke ScaleAcute stroke severity0 to 42; higher is worse

Task specific training

Task specific (task oriented) training means practicing whole, functional tasks (or meaningful parts of them) in a realistic context, with many repetitions, progressive difficulty and feedback. Examples include repeated sit to stand from different seat heights, reaching for objects of different sizes at different distances, and stepping practice over and around obstacles. It exploits specificity. Strengthening still helps when weakness limits the task, and progressive resistance training after stroke does not worsen spasticity.

Walking recovery: intensity and stepping practice

The clinical practice guideline on improving locomotor function in chronic (more than six months) stroke, spinal cord injury and brain injury recommends moderate to high intensity walking training as the core intervention: large amounts of stepping practice at about 60 to 80 percent of heart rate reserve or 70 to 85 percent of age predicted maximum heart rate, or a rating of perceived exertion of roughly 15 to 17 on the 6 to 20 scale. Train on a treadmill or overground with variable tasks (speeds, slopes, surfaces, obstacles). Balance training without walking, seated exercise and robotic gait training should not replace stepping practice when walking is the goal. Beta blockers blunt heart rate, so use perceived exertion in those patients.

Body weight supported treadmill training (BWSTT) unloads part of body weight with a harness so patients who cannot yet walk independently can step safely and repetitively. Start with no more than about 30 to 40 percent support, reduce it as loading improves, and progress speed toward normal. A large trial in subacute stroke found BWSTT no better than an equal dose of progressive home exercise: the active ingredient is the amount and intensity of stepping, not the device.

Constraint induced movement therapy

Constraint induced movement therapy (CIMT) reverses learned nonuse by restraining the less affected upper extremity and intensively training the more affected one. The traditional protocol has three components: restraint of the less affected hand in a mitt for about 90 percent of waking hours; intensive training of the more affected arm for about six hours per day for two weeks using shaping (tasks progressed in small steps, with immediate feedback on improvement) and repetitive task practice; and a transfer package of behavioral strategies (daily activity log, home practice, problem solving) to carry use into daily life. Modified CIMT (mCIMT) uses shorter daily training (for example, a few hours) over more weeks with restraint for part of the day and is more practical in most settings.

Eligibility is essential: the classic minimum motor criteria are at least 20 degrees of active wrist extension and 10 degrees of active extension at the thumb and at least two fingers (metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joints). Patients also need safe balance while wearing the mitt and enough cognition to participate. Very high dose CIMT in the first days after stroke has not shown added benefit.

Patient goal? Walking Use of the affected arm Moderate to high intensity stepping(70 to 85% HRmax, RPE 15 to 17),treadmill or overground, BWS if needed Active wrist ext 20°and finger ext 10°? Yes: CIMTor modified CIMT No: task practicewith NMES or FES,mirror therapy,assisted repetitions Foot drop: AFO or peroneal FEStimed to swing phase
Figure 5.7 A simplified decision path for choosing high evidence interventions. Every branch shares the same active ingredients: task specific practice, many repetitions and adequate intensity. Screen vital signs and safety before every progression.

Electrical stimulation in neurologic rehabilitation

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) produces muscle contraction by depolarizing the motor nerve. When the contraction is timed to accomplish a functional task (dorsiflexion during swing, grasp and release, cycling) it is called functional electrical stimulation (FES). Common uses are listed below.

ParameterTypical setting for motor NMES and FESReason
WaveformBiphasic pulsed current (symmetric or asymmetric)Comfort and no net charge buildup under electrodes
FrequencyAbout 30 to 50 pulses per second (often 35 for functional use)Produces a fused (tetanic) contraction; higher frequencies fatigue faster
Pulse durationAbout 200 to 350 microseconds for large muscles, shorter for small musclesRecruits motor fibers comfortably
AmplitudeTo a visible, functional contraction (for strengthening, as high as tolerated)Force depends on the number of motor units recruited
On:off timeStart about 1:3 to 1:5; progress toward 1:1 as tolerance improvesLimits fatigue in weak, deconditioned muscle
RampAbout 1 to 2 seconds or more; longer if spasticity in the antagonistComfort, and avoids triggering a stretch reflex in the antagonist

Contraindications to electrical stimulation include a demand type cardiac pacemaker or implanted defibrillator (avoid stimulation near it and generally avoid stimulation in these patients unless cleared), placement over the carotid sinus or anterior neck, over a known or suspected deep vein thrombosis or thrombophlebitis, over the trunk or pelvis during pregnancy, over an area of active or suspected malignancy, and over the eyes. Precautions include impaired sensation, inability to communicate discomfort, cardiac disease, seizure disorder, open wounds or damaged skin, and patients at risk of autonomic dysreflexia. Check the skin before and after each session.

Other options include mirror therapy (a visual illusion of the affected limb moving normally), mental practice, robotic and virtual reality devices that add repetitions, and bilateral arm training for patients who do not meet CIMT criteria. Older facilitation approaches such as NDT and PNF have not proven superior to task specific training.

Board tip. If a CIMT candidate question gives you range of motion, check the numbers: active wrist extension at least 20 degrees and finger extension at least 10 degrees. A patient with a flaccid hand is not a candidate. If a walking question asks for the most effective intervention in chronic stroke, choose high intensity, variable stepping practice over balance board training, seated exercise or a robotic device.
Case. A 58 year old woman eight months after a right MCA stroke walks with a cane at 0.52 m/s and wants to walk to her neighborhood store. She has foot drop on the left with a dorsiflexion catch on the Modified Tardieu, her resting heart rate is 72, she is not taking beta blockers, and her blood pressure is controlled. Her left hand has 30 degrees of active wrist extension and 15 degrees of finger extension.
Reasoning: Her speed places her in limited community ambulation (0.4 to 0.8 m/s); the goal requires community ambulation above 0.8 m/s. The best primary intervention for walking is moderate to high intensity stepping practice on the treadmill and overground (about 70 to 85 percent of age predicted maximal heart rate, roughly 113 to 138 beats per minute for a 58 year old) with variable tasks, plus a peroneal FES device or AFO for foot drop. Her hand meets the motor criteria, so modified CIMT is an appropriate addition for the arm. Wrong choices: low intensity balance exercises alone, or waiting for spasticity to be "normalized" before walking. Safety point: monitor blood pressure and symptoms during high intensity work and stop for chest pain, dizziness, severe dyspnea or a hypertensive response.
Key point

Choose outcome measures at the activity level for goals and know their scales (Fugl-Meyer 100 motor, ARAT 57, FIM 18 to 126). The highest value interventions share the same ingredients: task specific practice, many repetitions and adequate intensity. For walking, that means moderate to high intensity stepping practice; for the arm, CIMT when the patient has at least 20 degrees of active wrist extension and 10 degrees of finger extension; and FES timed to function for foot drop, subluxation and paralyzed muscles, with its contraindications respected.

The chapter in one breath

  • The homunculus puts the leg medially (ACA) and the face and arm laterally (MCA); Broca and Wernicke areas are in the dominant hemisphere, and neglect follows nondominant parietal lesions.
  • The corticospinal tract crosses at the pyramids, the dorsal columns cross in the medulla and the spinothalamic tract crosses within one or two segments; these levels predict which side is affected.
  • Cerebellar lesions cause ipsilateral ataxia, dysmetria and intention tremor without weakness; basal ganglia lesions cause hypokinetic or hyperkinetic disorders.
  • Crossed findings (ipsilateral cranial nerve, contralateral body) localize to the brainstem and the posterior circulation; new ones need emergency referral.
  • Spasticity is velocity dependent and graded with the Modified Ashworth Scale; rigidity is not velocity dependent.
  • UMN signs: spasticity, hyperreflexia, clonus, Babinski; LMN signs: flaccidity, hyporeflexia, atrophy, fasciculations.
  • Learning is measured by retention and transfer; random practice and reduced feedback improve learning even though they lower in-session performance.
  • Match strategies to the cognitive, associative and autonomous stages, and apply the principles of experience dependent plasticity: specificity, repetition, intensity and salience.
  • Balance uses somatosensory, visual and vestibular input; SOT conditions 5 and 6 leave only vestibular input.
  • Usual fall risk cutoffs: Berg below 45, TUG 13.5 seconds or more, DGI 19 or less, FGA 22 or less, ABC below 67 percent; gait speed below 0.4, 0.4 to 0.8 and above 0.8 m/s for household, limited and community walking.
  • For walking, use moderate to high intensity stepping practice; for the arm, CIMT needs 20 degrees of wrist and 10 degrees of finger extension; FES works only with an intact peripheral nerve.

Words worth knowing

TermWhat it means
AnosognosiaUnawareness or denial of one's own deficit, typically after a nondominant parietal lesion; a major safety concern.
ApraxiaInability to perform a learned, purposeful movement despite intact strength, sensation, coordination and comprehension.
Blocked practiceRepeating one task many times before moving to the next; good for early acquisition, weaker for retention.
ClonusRhythmic, involuntary oscillating contractions in response to a quick sustained stretch; an upper motor neuron sign.
Constraint induced movement therapyRestraint of the less affected arm plus intensive shaping practice of the more affected arm to overcome learned nonuse.
Contextual interferenceThe learning benefit of practicing several tasks in a mixed order, which disrupts performance but improves retention.
Crossed findingsCranial nerve signs on one side with body signs on the other; localizes to the brainstem.
DysdiadochokinesiaImpaired ability to perform rapid alternating movements; a cerebellar sign.
DysmetriaInability to judge the distance or range of a movement, causing overshoot or undershoot of a target.
Functional electrical stimulationElectrical stimulation timed to produce a functional movement, such as dorsiflexion during the swing phase of gait.
Intention tremorTremor that appears or worsens as a limb approaches a target; a cerebellar sign.
Knowledge of performanceFeedback about the quality or pattern of the movement itself.
Knowledge of resultsFeedback about the outcome of the movement relative to the goal.
Modified Ashworth ScaleA six level ordinal scale (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, 4) that grades resistance to passive stretch in spasticity.
NeuroplasticityThe capacity of the nervous system to change its structure and function in response to experience or injury.
Random practicePracticing several tasks in a varied order; improves retention and transfer.
RigidityIncreased resistance to passive movement that is not velocity dependent and affects agonists and antagonists equally.
Romberg testStanding with feet together, eyes open then closed; loss of balance only with the eyes closed points to a proprioceptive or vestibular deficit.
ShapingProgressing a task in small, achievable steps with immediate feedback on improvement; a core element of CIMT.
SpasticityVelocity dependent increase in resistance to passive stretch due to hyperexcitable stretch reflexes after an upper motor neuron lesion.

Check yourself

A patient has weakness and sensory loss of the left leg much greater than the left arm, plus urinary incontinence and slowed responses. Which artery is most likely involved?
Answer. The right anterior cerebral artery. The ACA supplies the medial hemisphere where the leg area of the homunculus lies, and the medial frontal lobe controls bladder inhibition and initiation. Signs are contralateral to the lesion.
After a right spinal cord hemisection at T8, which deficits are expected on each side below the lesion?
Answer. Right side: weakness (lateral corticospinal tract) and loss of vibration and proprioception (dorsal columns, which ascend ipsilaterally). Left side: loss of pain and temperature beginning one to two segments below the lesion (spinothalamic fibers have already crossed).
A patient protrudes the tongue and it deviates to the left. Where is the lesion if the problem is in the nerve itself?
Answer. The left hypoglossal nerve (CN XII). The intact right genioglossus pushes the tongue toward the weak side, so with a lower motor neuron lesion the tongue deviates toward the lesion.
During passive elbow extension, a therapist feels a catch followed by minimal resistance through less than half of the remaining range. What is the Modified Ashworth grade?
Answer. 1+. Grade 1 is a catch and release or minimal resistance only at end range; grade 2 is a marked increase through most of the range with the limb still easily moved.
A patient with right sided incoordination shows intention tremor on finger to nose and dysdiadochokinesia, with normal strength. Which side and structure are most likely involved?
Answer. The right cerebellar hemisphere. Cerebellar signs are ipsilateral to the lesion, and the cerebellum affects coordination, not strength.
A patient walks well on parallel bar practice with continuous verbal correction but performs poorly when tested the next day. What change to the feedback schedule would best improve retention?
Answer. Reduce and delay feedback: use faded, bandwidth or summary feedback and ask the patient to self assess first. Continuous concurrent feedback creates dependence (the guidance hypothesis) and depresses retention.
A patient keeps her balance in SOT conditions 1 to 4 but falls in conditions 5 and 6. What does this pattern suggest?
Answer. Vestibular dysfunction. Conditions 5 and 6 remove accurate vision and somatosensation, leaving only vestibular input.
A community dwelling 78 year old scores 47/56 on the Berg and 15 seconds on the TUG. How should these results be interpreted?
Answer. The Berg is above the usual cutoff of 45, but the TUG of 15 seconds exceeds 13.5 seconds, so fall risk is increased. The Berg has a ceiling effect in higher functioning people, which is why a dynamic test such as the TUG, DGI or FGA adds information.
Which minimum active motion criteria are traditionally required for constraint induced movement therapy?
Answer. At least 20 degrees of active wrist extension and 10 degrees of active extension of the thumb and at least two fingers, along with adequate balance and safety while wearing the mitt.
A patient has foot drop from a peroneal nerve laceration with denervation of the anterior compartment. Is a peroneal FES device appropriate?
Answer. No. FES depolarizes the motor nerve and requires an intact lower motor neuron. A denervated muscle does not respond to standard NMES parameters; an ankle foot orthosis is the better choice for foot clearance.